Home › Ratings

Where we stand

AISD's "unacceptable" ratings

Three neighborhood middle schools sit at the center of the takeover threat.

3

Campuses on the line

Dobie, Webb & Burnet middle schools.22

Since 2018–19

Consecutive years

Each has earned repeated "unacceptable" ratings.22

5

Is the trigger

A fifth consecutive unacceptable rating forces the state's hand.12

What a 5th strike triggers

If a campus hits five consecutive unacceptable ratings, state law (Texas Education Code, Chapter 39A) gives the Education Commissioner two options:12

Close the campus

The state can order the school shut down.

Replace the elected board

Install a state-appointed board of managers over the whole district.

What an "unacceptable" rating actually measures

≤ 59

= an F rating

A campus is rated F when its overall score falls at or below 59 on a 0–99 scale. The overall grade is the better of Achievement or Progress (70%) plus Closing the Gaps (30%).7

The score blends three domains:6

Student Achievement

Share of students who passed STAAR. (High schools also count graduation rates and college/career readiness.)8

School Progress

STAAR growth year to year, plus results vs. similar-poverty schools.9

Closing the Gaps

STAAR results broken out by student group.10

What the rating does NOT capture

  • Attendance & engagement
  • Fine arts, PE & electives
  • Teacher retention
  • School climate & belonging
  • Growth in untested subjects
  • Whether kids feel known

The bottom line. For our middle schools, all three domains rest on STAAR — an unacceptable rating is a snapshot of one test, not a verdict on whether students are engaged, supported, or thriving.

D and F ratings cluster in schools serving more low-income students, and the system is widely criticized for measuring poverty and resources as much as teaching.11